AWARENESS

This is a little something I wrote maybe 6 months ago, maybe a little longer. It seems to me that I was kind of fed up with sceptics at that time. I was tierd of those people who said to me that I couldn't possibly believe in someting that isn't proved by common science yet. I have been told a trillion times that believing in anything other that science is against common sense. Somtimes I've even heard comments by people who has suggested that having ideas which run outside or beyond science is a sign of mental illness.

What appears to me very clearly, though, is that it isn't the act of believing that is wrong, what is wrong is when the believing becomes a conviction and your mind stagnates in that way of thinking. I think that it's important to keep your mind moving and all doors open, even those doors which isn't that likely to lead to something real or a true bigger understanding. Why is this important? Because you don't know now, and can't decide today, what can become essential in the future.

Religion is often a conviction, when the believers have closed all doors but the one door through which it's meant for those people to go through. Often they don't belive in everything science is teaching, and neither in the things that people of other religions believe in. They have their believes and nothing else will be considered.

This is the same way that "science-believers" act, from my point of view. They accept all that science is telling us, their gods are the scientists and their bible is the scientifical method. Don't get me wrong here, there's nothing wrong with believing in science, because science is a very good way of knowing more and more of our world. As a matter of fact, many people think it's the only way of knowing anything about our reality. Anyway, listening to what science says isn't wrong. What's wrong, again, is when the belief turns into conviction and the believer becomes convinced. Because when you're convinced, then your mind is set and you have decided not to change it. In my opinion that is a point when you stop developing and growing. Seeing that life is development, you actually stop living at that point too. That isn't good, is it?

´o_O`

For that reason, my idea here is to keep doors open and never stop searching, don't ever be convinced but keep your mind formable. What I have written down here are a few thoughts about why some people want to stay close to the most busy roads and don't ever want to roam the more unknown paths to experience and explore. I have also philosophised a bit about science and if there could exist phenomena and theories that science would have a hard time to grasp, with the methods we have at hand today.

What I refer to as a sceptic in this text below is a person who firmly rejects all kinds of phenomena, theories, ideas and thoughts that are not proved by todays common science. I do see myself as a person who is able to think sceptical and critical, because I question everything many times over and I never swallow anything unshewed. But here a sceptic is a person who is convinced that the world looks like science shows that it can't possibly look any other way. That is the distinction between a sceptic and a person who thinks sceptical, from my point of view.

---

I think that in their hearts, many who are sceptic to a deeper meaning in life, would like to believe in a meaningfull Universe, a bigger potential in our being and even in a life after death. The thought do appeal even to them. But that is in their hearts. In their minds, however, they won't belive in such things at all. Believing in things that science can't prove is against common sense, I think many of them are feeling. Instead of even noticing the feeling deep in their hearts, they put all their faith in today's science and they are not really aware of what they are doing is also believing. They believe in science and that science has come up with most of the explanations for the nature of this world and reality by this time. But has it really? Should we be sure of that?



Quite a lot of the most extreme sceptics have indeed been "believers" as kids. Maybe they thought Santa was for real, that there where aliens on Mars, a man in the Moon or little creatures lurking in the woods. When they got older and came to understand, by their own intellect or by help of others, that there is no Santa flying around the whole Earth in december and most likely no men on Mars or the Moon either, my guess is that they felt very disappointed and deceived. As a defence mechanism these kids decided never to believe in anything that stupid again. The only thing they decided to belive in hereafter, as they were growing up, was nothing more or less than what science, authorities and the majority of all people belive at the same time. That way they will not be taking any risks of being deceived and embarrassed again. Now, if what they have thought was true will prove to be wrong in the future, it will not be so bad because then nearly everyone had been wrong about it. What these people won't do again is taking those risks that you take when you believe in someting that isn't yet proved by common science nor believed in by the majority. Is it the fear of being wrong that keeps them away from the lesser walked paths? Is this why they critizice people who dare to consider things outside the well-known areas?



I guess even the most sceptical of sceptics knows that at this time, in the beginning of the third millennium, there are still a lot more left for science to discover, examine and explain. However, they do not belive in the possibility that this could be something that will change the human point of view more or less drasticly. Sceptics see no reason to take anything that science can't handle and prove at this point in time into consideration. Small, small steps are required for them to feel safe and out of the risk of deception. Everything that isn't compatible with what we know today is looked upon with very sceptical eyes. Sceptical you should be, but not closed to the possibilities that we have overlooked someting that could give us an even more complete picture of our reality.

Paranormal phenomena is one area that isn't considered by many people. This is because it doesn't fit into the picture of our worldview that science has painted so far. I think another reason is that if paranormal phenomena would be an accepted part of science, it would have a lot of consequences for all human beings. But here is a contradicion, because quantum theory also is very controversial and brings a lot of consequences in our way of seeing the world and ourselves. I don't think you should be afraid of changing your worldview. I think it's meant to be changed all the time. That is what development is, in my opinion, changing yourself and the way you look at things. I think paranormal phenomena should be taken into concideration and be studied much more.

Although the scientifical methods of investigation are mostly developed and adapted to explore the physical world, many sceptics use the argument that paranormal phenomena are not real because we have not been able to get strong, clear and consistant proof yet. We do have evidence that make good grounds for looking further into the matter, but we are still lacking the kind of proof that can get science, and with that, the majority, conclusively convinced. The contradiction I can see in this is that nobody claims paranormal experiences, and with that the spiritual aspect of reality, to be physical phenomena. Hence, the methods used to learn more about the physical reality may not be the most suitable for learning more about the non-physical, or spiritual, reality.

On the other hand I do understand that we must start with what we (think we) know today and continue from that point. Though the source of the paranormal phenomena may not be physical in the way we know it, there are ways that they appear in the physical. Examples are psychokinesis (influence on the physical in a non-physical way), healing, and different kinds of ESP (extrasensory perception) that is confirmable in the physical reality. If we, as a society, are able to establish and keep the right attitude, openness and sense for truth, I think we will learn a lot more about our reality and one day eventually find a bridge that connects the physical and the spiritual. Many individuals are on a good way to find this bridge. We can say that this search has a lead on the individual level. Those people are just waiting for the crowd to catch up.

Miria, 2006

---